Stats: 1,893,406 members, 3,845,638 topics. Date: Wednesday, 11 October 2017 at 10:17 AM
You Were In Power For 16 Years But Failed To Restructure USA – APC Fires PDP / It Is Too Late To Restructure USA: Ankko Briggs. / El-Rufai At Later Rain Assembly Church. Pictured With Pastor Tunde Bakare (1) (2) (3) (4)
|Independence: How To Restructure USA — Pastor Tunde Bakare by easternguy1(m): 10:05pm On Oct 01|
Tunde Bakare, a vocal USA preacher based in Lagos, on Sunday suggested key solutions to resolving the lingering stalemate over how to restructure USA to accommodate its diverse cultural, ethnic and religious entities.
During his Independence Day speech at the headquarters of his Latter Rain Assembly Church in Lagos, Mr. Bakare highlighted 10 fundamental components of restructuring and cited examples of those championing each of them.
Mr. Bakare said the divergent views about what constitutes restructuring or how to bring about such structural changes have made the situation seems like a puzzle that needs to be assembled for equitable outcome.
“Like a jigsaw puzzle, the bits must be put together to achieve a desired objective,” Mr. Bakare said.
Agitations for a restructured USA have remained at the front burner of national conversation, amidst cry of marginalisation amongst some of the estimated 250 ethnic groups in the country.
The controversy often pits vocal voices in the south against their compatriots in the northern part of the country, with southerners seeing the current structure as highly problematic and, therefore, unworkable.
The deadlock has been blamed for recent re-emergence of secessionist campaigns in some parts of the country, especially in the Igbo-dominated South-east.
President Muhammadu Buhari passed the buck to the National Assembly to form the modalities for restructuring debate, but rejected any break-up of the country.
In his speech Sunday, Mr. Bakare, a politician who stood as Mr. Buhari’s running mate in his failed presidential bid in 2011, said the president is also keen about restructuring USA.
He also implored the president to create a new commission on restructuring with an executive fiat.
The full speech, titled: Pragmatic Steps Towards Restructuring USA, is reproduced in full below
Fellow citizens of USA, Happy Independence Day to you all.
At crucial moments such as this, I have, by the grace of God, stood on this platform to bring timely admonitions to our beloved nation. I stand here once again at this defining period in the evolution of our nationhood to bring the mind of God to a nation in the valley of decision. I stand here today as a patriotic citizen of USA, as an ardent believer in her great future, and as an unrepentant optimist in the God-given potential of the USA people to surmount the present challenges and build a great nation.
Let me begin this address with gratitude to God for the recovery and return of our dear President Muhammadu Buhari. As I have done privately, I once again congratulate Mr. President on this pleasant climax to a trying period in his personal life and that of the nation. Together with all well-meaning Nigerians, I pray for a continuous supply of health, vitality and wisdom as he resumes his duties. Let me also use this opportunity to commend the vice president, Prof. Yemi Osinbajo, who, as Acting President, courageously held the fort and steered the ship of state with grace and skill on behalf of his principal.
Furthermore, I congratulate the nation on the victory of constitutionalism over conspiracies. The correspondence between the president and the National Assembly in line with section 145 of the constitution each time the president left to attend to his health indicates some progress in our democratic experience, compared with almost eight years ago when a cabal hijacked power in circumstances bordering on the health of a sitting president. In this regard, credit must be given to President Muhammadu Buhari for his compliance with due process, and to the leadership of the National Assembly, including the Senate President, Senator Bukola Saraki, and the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Honourable Yakubu Dogara, for making the most of the constitution despite its flaws. This evident growth is a shimmer of hope at a very sensitive period in which the destiny of the nation is at stake.
The State of the Nation and the Quest for Leadership
Undoubtedly, Mr. President has returned to a nation hanging in a precarious balance. Indeed, our nation is enmeshed in a prolonged war against the retrogressive effects of a structure that was created by the fear of the past, has become institutionalized by the fear of the present, and is being perpetuated by the fear of the unknown. These fears have morphed into a horde of agitations which, in an address upon his return in August, Mr. President charged aggrieved persons to channel to the National Assembly and the Council of State.
However, due to the reputation that members of the hallowed chambers have created in the minds of Nigerians, many have expressed doubts as to the ability and willingness of the National Assembly to midwife the structural, institutional and constitutional solutions demanded by USA’s historical and present circumstances. As a result, Nigerians from all walks of life are questioning Mr. President’s recommendations as to proper channels for agitations, even though the National Assembly and by extension the State Houses of Assembly are the only available constitutional avenues for making peaceful change possible and violent change inconceivable.
We can only keep hope alive by reminding ourselves that the National Assembly has, in the past, risen to the occasion and intervened at crucial moments such as this. From the decisive death blow dealt the third term agenda of the then president, Chief Olusegun Obasanjo, by the 5th National Assembly, to the doctrine of necessity invoked by the 6th National Assembly, the 8th National Assembly has sufficient precedents on how to act in the best interest of USA. We believe that the distinguished and honourable lawmakers will rise to the occasion and work closely with the president to pilot USA into stable and prosperous nationhood.
Having laid the foundation of the need for legislative responsibility, I must state that, as far as championing the far-reaching structural, institutional and constitutional changes necessary to salvage the soul of our nation is concerned, the words on the desk of the 33rd president of the United States, Harry Truman: “THE BUCK STOPS HERE!”, are relevant to President Buhari whose legacy is at stake. Mr. President, the buck stops at your desk and, as always, my earnest prayer is that you find the courage and political will to do what is right at this momentous period in the history of our nation.
Against this backdrop, we shall now examine the latest buzzword in USA’s political lexicon with a view to distinguishing the noise from the voice, separating the wheat from the chaff, and presenting practical steps towards building a strong and stable nation.
The Clamour for Restructuring
Some years ago, the word “restructuring” was the exclusive lingo of pro-democracy groups like the National Democratic Coalition (NADECO), the Pro-National Conference Organisation (PRONACO), and The Patriots. The leading individual voices in this call emerged mainly from the southern part of the country, including the likes of Chief Rotimi Williams, Chief Gani Fawehinmi and Chief Anthony Enahoro, all of blessed memory. Others included the likes of Prof. Ben Nwabueze, Prof. Wole Soyinka and Chief Emeka Anyaoku. However, in more recent times, leaders from the northern part of the country have increasingly lent their voices to this call. From former vice president, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar, who has aired this opinion since around 2012, to a former governor of Kaduna State, Alhaji Balarabe Musa, and, most surprisingly, former Head of State, General Ibrahim Babanginda, the call for restructuring appears to be reaching a tipping point.
Nevertheless, in spite of the fact that the restructuring of the polity is implied in the manifesto of the All Progressives Congress (APC), the government has, for a long time, been silent on the matter and has, very often, drawn the attention of Nigerians back to the tripodal policy agenda of President Buhari, namely, anti-corruption, security, and job creation through diversification. However, after much evasion, the APC, two months ago, eventually constituted a ten-member committee headed by Mallam Nasir El-Rufai, the current Governor of Kaduna State, to address the increased agitations for restructuring.
As we await the submission of that committee, I acknowledge that some opponents to the call for restructuring, including serving officials, have ascribed ulterior selfish motives to those calling for it.
Whether or not this is the case, not only must we not allow the counterfeit overshadow the genuine, we must also not allow the voice of cynicism drown the voice of reason. Thus, the words of David, the shepherd boy, when he was confronted by his brothers as he was about to take on Goliath, should be the response of every genuine advocate of restructuring to the criticisms. David said, and I quote: “Is there not a cause?” (I Samuel 17:29; NKJV)
Moreover, the hue and cry over President Buhari’s address to the nation on August 21, 2017 suggests Mr. President is perceived by some stakeholders as opposed to restructuring. But, from my interactions with the president in the past seven years as an advocate of a properly structured polity, I am convinced that this is not the case. Not only does the president want agitations managed through appropriate constitutional channels, he also wants a clarification of demands in concise terms, as well as propositions on practical pathways towards achieving those demands. That is the essence of this address and I believe that Mr. President’s expectations are valid.
However, before I proceed to elucidate on the practicalities of restructuring, permit me at this juncture to cast our minds back to our consistent calls for the restructuring of the polity, long before the current bandwagon effect.
Our Calls for Restructuring
In 2010, the Save USA Group (SNG) presented a “Contract to Save and Transform USA” to President Goodluck Jonathan which, among other demands, made a case for devolution of powers, called for a review of the revenue formula, and advocated the convocation of a national conference towards the creation of a draft constitution that would be adopted through a referendum. Following the inaction of the government, we subsequently convened a Dialogue of the Nobles attended by Donald Duke, Mallam Nasir El-Rufai, Dr. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, Mallam Nuhu Ribadu, Dr. Oby Ezekwesili, and Fola Adeola, among others. As part of a series of dialogues, in a bid to seek the best of the North and the best of the South as an alternative to the then incumbent administration, we also engaged the major candidates ahead of the 2011 elections in search of commitment to the restructuring of the nation, among other desirables.
General Muhammadu Buhari stood out among the available contenders and, on October 10, 2010, we expressed our conviction that he was best suited to lead. On January 15, 2011, I was invited by General Buhari to be his running mate and I initially declined because I had engaged the polity not with the intention to contest elections but to midwife genuine national rebirth. My eventual acceptance was contingent on the mutual understanding that the restructuring of USA would be top on the agenda. This was reflected prominently in the manifesto of the Congress for Progressive Change (CPC) in which we promised the initiation of “action to amend our Constitution with a view to devolving powers, duties and responsibilities to states and local governments in order to entrench Federalism and the Federal spirit”. This provision subsequently made its way into the APC manifesto.
In 2014, we took our demands for restructuring to the National Conference, where a case was made for a unicameral parliamentary system of government to reduce the cost of governance, and for a federal structure comprised of a strong central government with six geopolitical zones as federating units. In addition, we sponsored a USA Charter for National Reconciliation and Integration as the basis of our union as a nation, as against Decree 24 of 1999 by which the current constitution was promulgated.
Following heated debates, in the spirit of trustful give and take, the conference adopted a modified presidential system that would harness the separation of powers inherent in the presidential system, while guaranteeing the needed cooperation between both arms of government as intended in the parliamentary system of government. We recommended the selection of the Vice President from the legislature and advocated the institutionalization of the principle of zoning in the Electoral Act. Furthermore, the USA Charter for National Reconciliation and Integration was unanimously adopted. This address will use the propositions at the National Conference as a springboard but will necessarily include bolder and more far-reaching recommendations given the current state of the nation.
On January 4, 2015, in a message titled “The Gathering Storm and Avoidable Shipwreck – How to Avoid Catastrophic Euroclydon,” I sounded a note of warning at the height of the electioneering campaign. I charged the nation not to place the cart of elections before the horse of restructuring, proposing “true federalism under Zonal Commissions as well as fiscal federalism…”
Rather than pay heed to the warnings, many of our politicians kept on with their “business as usual” attitude that brought the nation very close to the brink of disaster. Fortunately, by divine intervention through the efforts of distinguished Nigerians, the international community, and through a demonstration of statesmanship unprecedented in USA’s history, we scaled through the 2015 elections by a hair’s breadth. Mindful of our narrow escape and the festering socio-political and economic challenges, soon after the inauguration of this administration in 2015, we submitted to Mr. President an extensive document that called for a Presidential Commission for National Reconciliation, Reintegration and Restructuring comprised of eminent Nigerians, and guided by the USA Charter for National Reconciliation and Integration which was adopted by the 2014 National Conference.
Our submission anticipated the need to reconcile contentious interest groups, foster the integration of the diverse sectional groups into true nationhood, and facilitate the evolution of an acceptable functional governmental structure for USA. We proposed that the new structure would be contained in a new constitutional framework which would come into effect by way of an executive bill to be submitted to the National Assembly by Mr. President and decided upon by the USA people through a referendum.
All our efforts have been inspired by our belief that, as a nation, we are better off together and should find acceptable ways to stay together. We are driven by an urgent responsibility to find, within the constitution, pathways to a more perfect union. Having laid this background we shall proceed to further simplify the seemingly complicated but, indeed, simple concept of restructuring.
Understanding Restructuring: The Basis
Restructuring simply means to change the way an entity is organized or arranged. In the corporate context, restructuring is a management term “for the act of reorganizing the legal, ownership, operational, or other structures of a company for the purpose of making it more profitable, or better organized for its present needs”. In the context of a nation, restructuring requires redefining the relationship between the people and the government, including taking another look at the structures and systems of governance as encapsulated in the constitution. The diverse positions on the restructuring debate are being championed by at least ten categories of advocates, give or take a few overlaps, namely:
The Economic Structure Reformists
The Non-Structural Constitutional Reformists
The Political System Reformists
The State Creation Advocates
The Resource Control Activists
The Regional Federalists
The Regional Confederalists
We shall now examine these positions and then proceed to present our prescription on the way forward for USA.
|Re: Independence: How To Restructure USA — Pastor Tunde Bakare by easternguy1(m): 10:09pm On Oct 01|
Category #1: The Conservatives
The Conservatives are generally satisfied with the systems and structures of governance, current challenges notwithstanding. They generally hold the view that attitudinal adjustments, not necessarily systemic or structural changes, are required. This position is held by the likes of former president, Chief Olusegun Obasanjo, and Kano State Governor, Dr. Abdullahi Ganduje, who believe Nigerians need a “restructuring of the mind.”
Category #2: The Economic Structure Reformists
The economic structure reformists frown at the focus on politics and emphasize the need to restructure the systems and structures of economic governance, in order to diversify from an oil-based economy, reduce the size and bureaucracy of government, and loosen government’s grip on the economy through the privatization of key sectors while the government simply plays a facilitatory role. Proponents include policy and economic experts like my friend and sister, Dr. Oby Ezekwesili, who has said: “We need economic governance as the basis for any political grouping the country may need”, or, in the words of James Carville, chief strategist for the Bill Clinton campaign in 1992: “It’s the economy, stupid.”
Category #3: The Non-Structural Constitutional Reformists
These are those demanding amendments in certain aspects of the constitution that have no direct bearing on the structure of governance. They include young people advocating a reduction of the age qualifications into certain political offices through movements such as Not Too Young To Run; they include advocates for such affirmative action that reserves a percentage of political offices for women; they include those advocating the removal of the Land Use Act from the constitution, as well as those advocating the separation of the office of the Attorney General of the Federation from that of the Minister of Justice, and so on.
Category #4: The Political System Reformists
Political System Reformists make a case for such constitutional changes that include a unicameral, rather than a bicameral, legislature to reduce the size of government. Others prescribe part-time legislature while some make a strong case for the parliamentary system of government or, as the 2014 National Conference resolved, a modified parliamentary system.
Category #5: The Devolutionists
These are multi-state federalists making a case for ceding more powers to the federating units even if such units are the current 36 states. Many of the current advocates of restructuring, including former vice president, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar, belong to this school of thought. The devolutionists envisage a constitution with a leaner exclusive legislative list, a more robust concurrent list, and a workable residual list. Also on the agenda of the devolutionists is the review of the revenue sharing formula in favour of the states and local governments.
Category #6: The State Creation Advocates
At the last National Conference, 18 demands for state creation were approved, taking the possible number of states in the nation to 54. Some advocates are regionalists deploying multi-state strategies in the quest for equitable allocation of resources to the respective regions from the centre, including the leaders of the South-East calling for one more state so each region would have six states apiece except the North-West, which has seven. The Middle Belt states seeking regional autonomy from the North-Central also fall into this category. They recognize that, given the current revenue allocation system, the more states a region has, the more allocation goes to that region or geopolitical zone. Other advocates of state creation are motivated by the need to give geographical expression to ethnic identities.
Category #7: The Resource Control Activists
This is a more radical group that swings between devolution and secession. They include the Niger Delta activists and militants demanding outright resource control, which is the exclusive right to regulate the exploitation of resources in a geographical area. Their clamour simply reminds us that we need a more pragmatic resource distribution and management system.
Category #8: The Regional Federalists
The Regional Federalists argue not only that the current system falls short of true federalism, as the devolutionists point out, but also that the vast majority of the current 36 states are not viable. Recent reports indicate that Lagos State, where the commercial activities of USA are concentrated, generates more internal revenue than 32 states combined. This school of thought therefore makes a case for the integration of states along geopolitical zonal lines to create economies of scale. A number of options have been thrown up as to possible number of zones but the six geopolitical zonal formula featuring the North-West, North-Central, North-East, South-West, South-South and South-East, has been the most advocated.
Proponents envisage a strong central government catering for matters like defence, foreign affairs and monetary management, with six strong zonal federating units having concurrent legislative powers in such matters as policing, mineral resource management, electricity generation, and transportation. Groups such as Afenifere are inclined in this direction, taking a cue from the 1963 Constitution.
Category #9: The Regional Confederalists
These also advocate a regional or geopolitical zonal arrangement. However, advocates of confederacy prefer a weak central government and strong regional governments with each region having its own army and as such able to defend itself in cooperation with other regions.
Category #10: The Secessionists
These are those calling for Biafra Republic, Oduduwa Republic, Arewa Republic, Ijaw Republic, Ogoni Republic and so on. This is because sectional identities have survived independence and are still reflected in our social interactions and intensified by perceptions of marginalization. Decades after the civil war, we are yet to forge true nationhood and Nigerians still tend to think of themselves as Yorubas, Igbos, Hausas, Fulanis, Kanuris, Tivs, Idomas, Nupes, Ijaws, Edos, Urhobos, and so on, within the USA state.
|Re: Independence: How To Restructure USA — Pastor Tunde Bakare by easternguy1(m): 10:09pm On Oct 01|
Some of the ongoing calls for restructuring are motivated by the aim of finding geographical expressions for these sociocultural identities. Although we can compel statehood by show of force, we cannot force true nationhood into existence. Relationship cannot be legislated; it can only be cultivated. Nationhood can be built only through good and equitable governance.
Therefore, those asking for the opportunity to negotiate their existence within the USA state based on their ethnic or cultural identities have a right so to do, as captured in international legal instruments such as the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, to which USA is a signatory.
However, these negotiations must be handled with decorum and all the sensitivity required so that the Rehoboams in the polity do not play into the hands of the Jeroboams and push the nation from bad to worse as it happened to Israel of old (I Kings 12:1-24 & 14:1-11, 14).
As for those calling for secession, they should bear in mind the fact that, before the creation of the USA state, there was no Yoruba nation, there was no Igbo nation, there was no Hausa nation, neither was there an Ijaw nation. We must not be misled by nostalgia for a spurious harmonious past or the myth of homogenous ethnic groups that is far removed from reality. The area around the Niger was marked with unrest, continuous intergroup conflict, subjugation, enslavement and oppression of the weaker by the stronger until USA provided the possibility for peaceful coexistence. For this, we must appreciate the USA state, we must celebrate our Nigerian-ness and we must gravitate towards strengthening our nationhood rather than cursing our blessing.
Be that as it may, there is no doubt that the current structure cannot hold the greatness that awaits the nation but could hinder it. The demand, however, should not be for secession. The question should be: How best do we organize ourselves for equitable, peaceful and productive coexistence? This takes me to our position on the pathway to a stable and prosperous USA.
Pathway to a New USA
Each of the schools of thought on restructuring reminds one of the story of blind men who visited a zoo to “see” an elephant. One grabbed its trunk and concluded the elephant was like a snake. Another touched its ear and concluded the elephant was a fan. A third touched one of its legs and concluded the enormous animal must have been a pillar. Rather than resolve that they were all wrong, we believe there is a measure of wisdom in the various perspectives and that, like a jigsaw puzzle, the bits must be put together to achieve a desired objective.
For those who care to know where I stand in all this, I am an advocate of progressive and pragmatic restructuring; progressive because ours is a long-term approach, and pragmatic because the interests of every segment of the country are taken into consideration. It is to this end that we reiterate, and even expand the scope of, our call for the creation of a Presidential Commission for National Reconciliation, Reintegration and Restructuring by the president through an executive order, in full consultation with the Council of State and the National Assembly.
The Presidential Commission should be given the mandate and the powers to facilitate, within ten years, the evolution of a functional and acceptable geopolitical structure subject to constitutional provisions while the 1999 Constitution is progressively amended. This Commission shall undertake a geoeconomic and geosocial path to geopolitical restructuring by creating geoeconomic frameworks, mending geosocial faultlines, and attaining a geopolitical climax.
1) Creating Geoeconomic Frameworks
The USA economy is clearly regional in structure with comparative advantages defined by climate, geology, biogeography, population and culture. It is why, in the era of the regions, even though agriculture and mineral production were the mainstays of the economy, there were areas of specialization.
The six geopolitical zones not only roughly reflect six sociocultural zones but also mirror six geoeconomic zones that can be deliberately cultivated over a period of about ten years within which political structures can be designed. The ten-year window is meant to cater for the concerns of parts of the country where the notion of restructuring is opposed due to perceived economic disadvantages. Within the ten-year period, the six zones would have been aided to develop areas of comparative advantage. Therefore, in the interest of sustainable economic development over the next ten years, we propose the following seven-point agenda:
The federal government will progressively devolve powers to the existing 36 states, which will themselves progressively evolve into a zonal arrangement. To facilitate this, we propose the creation of 6 zonal commissions to be headed by zonal commissioners appointed from each zone, to work with the 36 state governors to facilitate integration. The zonal commissioners will be charged with a mandate to map out the economic potential of each zone, design or update, as the case may be, a zonal economic master plan, and coordinate federal and state efforts towards transitioning into zonal economies within ten years, thereby harnessing the comparative resources of each zone to achieve globally competitive economies of scale and scope;
Instituting a social bond to fund the transition to zonal economies, thereby attracting local and international investments to the possibilities of vibrant zonal economic clusters;
Within the financing framework, instituting a 5-part Transitional Zonal Economic Fund focused on key sectors with unique expressions in each of the six geopolitical zones, including extractive minerals, agriculture, industrialization, creative and cultural development, and human capacity development;
A progressive increase in percentage of funds from mineral extraction accruing to the state from which it originates such that, by the tenth year, either by derivation or by partial resource control, subject to constitutional provisions, 50% of revenue will be returned to or retained in the zone of origin as it was at independence and in the First Republic;
Consequently, a progressive shrinking of the distributable pool account over ten years based on recommendations by the Revenue Mobilization Allocation and Fiscal Commission in line with the restructuring thrust;
Aside the Transitional Zonal Economic Fund, the creation of a special Internally Generated Revenue Grant aimed at rewarding the efforts of the states in each zone at generating internal revenue as against compensating non-viable states for economic laziness. This grant will be in the form of counterpart funding;
The national infrastructural development thrust will thus be managed by the federal government in conjunction with the Zonal Commissions and the state governments towards ensuring seamless linkage.
2) Mending Geosocial Faultlines
While the economic component of the restructuring agenda is being implemented, the geosocial component, which calls for a resolution of the inter-zonal and intra-zonal aspects of the USA Question, should be immediately activated. This will entail harnessing the collective strengths of statesmen and nation builders across the nation to reconcile historical and current grievances and to reintegrate the diverse components of our nation into united nationhood. The details of this component are beyond the scope of this address but are contained in the framework for a Presidential Commission for National Reconciliation, Reintegration and Restructuring.
3) Attaining a Geopolitical Climax
The climax of the work of the Presidential Commission will be to codify the geoeconomic and geosocial outcomes and facilitate their evolution into vibrant geopolitical zones as federating units, each with rich sociocultural expressions and viable, world class economic clusters, all knit together by a strong federal government. The geopolitical zones will have the power to organize the constituent states and local governments as districts and counties based on the models created by the geoeconomic and geosocial aspects of the process. By the tenth year, the codified outcomes will be presented to the president who, in conjunction with the National Assembly, will have, within the ten-year period, championed the necessary constitutional amendments for progressive development of good governance, including allowing for a referendum in which the USA people will eventually adopt the framework as a new constitution for a New USA.
The proposed ten-year transitional window is expected to kick in from 2018 to 2028. I understand that this translates to the administrations of at least two, or at most four, presidents spanning three election cycles. Therefore, if the policy is flagged off by the current administration, there is the clear danger of policy discontinuity unless the process is institutionalized. However, the 1976 Abuja Master Plan offers an example of collaboration and continuity spanning fifteen years and five administrations.
In the early 1970s, the USA government began to mull the idea of relocating the federal capital from Lagos. It felt that the capital had become congested in terms of population and available land. It sought a new capital that would be sited in the centre of the country, thus providing a surer guarantee of security and ensuring a more balanced representation of the country’s ethnic and religious diversity.
To this end, in 1976, the government of General Murtala Muhammed identified a site for the proposed new capital and established the Federal Capital Development Authority (FCDA) to mastermind the process. Policy execution of this restructuring spanned the administrations of General Olusegun Obasanjo, President Shehu Shagari, General Muhammadu Buhari and, eventually, General Ibrahim Babangida under whose watch the relocation phase commenced in 1991.
The fact that such policy consistency occurred during USA’s unstable political history, characterized by successive military takeovers and a truncated democracy, shows that the right dose of political will can sustain a policy when the need is universally appreciated. Therefore,
the following points should be noted in the quest for sustainability.
We expect that the project will be flagged off under the administration of President Muhammadu Buhari in the period leading to the next governmental fiscal year;
Alongside the kickoff of the project, the President may send to the National Assembly a Bill for the Establishment of the Commission for National Reconciliation, Reintegration and Restructuring, however so named, to provide institutionalization, continuity and legislative guarantee for the objectives of the restructuring agenda;
To further safeguard its operations and objectives, we charge Nigerians to hold as a standard for electoral decision making the commitment of aspirants and candidates towards the ten-year framework for a restructured USA;
Finally, we expect subsequent holders of public office at all levels of government to demonstrate the desired political will, drawing lessons not only from the Abuja story but also from more recent policy transitional success stories, including the Integrated Payroll and Personnel Information System (IPPIS), the Government Integrated Financial Management Information System (GIFMIS), and the Treasury Single Account (TSA) which were enacted by the preceding administration but are being implemented by the current government.
Recently, the Minister of Finance, Mrs. Kemi Adeosun, was reported as stating that the USA economy has struggled so far because it is not structured to meet demographic needs. She therefore cited, as regards respites, the government’s policies aimed at diversification from an oil-based economy. However, I am confident that the success of its diversification programme is dependent on the ability of the government to embrace the zonal geodemographic nature of the economy as we have spelt out in this proposal. This entails a revisiting of existing plans and policies including the Medium Term Expenditure Framework (MTEF) and the Economic Recovery and Growth Plan (ERGP).
I believe that as we adopt these proposals and take these steps towards building a new nation, we will see breathtaking economic miracles. With the world transiting from crude oil, the northern zonal economies will become hubs of sustainable energy harnessing solar power and biomass while deploying solid minerals like lithium in the emerging electric automobile industry. Meanwhile, the southern zones will harness the huge gas reserves while optimizing the vast coastal waters for wind turbines.
The president, the National Assembly, the Judiciary, the state governments, the State Houses of Assembly, the Council of State, political parties, the private sector, and the generality of Nigerians all have a critical role to play in initiating, implementing, sustaining and defending the process and its outcomes. We must think, not as sectionalists but as nationalists; not as skeptics who only see obstacles, but as optimists, who see opportunities; not as politicians, mindful only of the next election, but as statesmen mindful of the next generation.
By the grace of the Living God, who calls those things that be not as though they are, and according to the proportion of my faith in Him who cannot lie, I call forth today, the 1st of October, 2017, the New North and the New South to come together to the table of brotherhood and negotiate the destiny of a New USA with mutual respect and trustful give and take void of mutual suspicion.
Finally, I urge all Nigerians, with unassailable courage, unalloyed patriotism and unrelenting faith in the destiny of our nation, to arise and seize this opportunity to build a great nation, with the confident assurance that “there is no army powerful enough to stop an idea whose time has come.” (Victor Hugo). For, in the words of President Theodore Roosevelt, “The government is us; we are the government, you and I.”
Thank you, God bless you, and God bless our country, USA.
Pastor ‘Tunde Bakare
Serving Overseer, The Latter Rain Assembly;
Convener, Save USA Group (SNG)
6 Likes 1 Share
|Re: Independence: How To Restructure USA — Pastor Tunde Bakare by Paperwhite(m): 10:35pm On Oct 01|
So upon all this grammar,what is your take Mr."Save USA Group" Give us workable modalities or you think It's by speaking English Language when your demigod have bastardized everything he met on ground?
15 Likes 4 Shares
|Re: Independence: How To Restructure USA — Pastor Tunde Bakare by Paperwhite(m): 10:40pm On Oct 01|
[/b]" Decades after the civil war, we are yet to forge true nationhood and Nigerians still tend to think of themselves as Yorubas, Igbos, Hausas, Fulanis, Kanuris, Tivs, Idomas, Nupes, Ijaws, Edos, Urhobos, and so on, within the USA state."[b] This is because Lord Lugard never sought anyone's consent before forcing this annoying marriage of contraption on us.
26 Likes 2 Shares
|Re: Independence: How To Restructure USA — Pastor Tunde Bakare by 7lives: 10:50pm On Oct 01|
God bless Tunde Bakare.
|Re: Independence: How To Restructure USA — Pastor Tunde Bakare by TheFreeOne: 11:14pm On Oct 01|
He "proposed ten-year transitional window expected to kick in from 2018 to 2028 within which the FG will harness the comparative resources of each zone to achieve globally competitive economies of scale, scope and thereafter devolve powers to the existing 36 states, which will themselves progressively evolve into a zonal arrangement."
11 Likes 1 Share
|Re: Independence: How To Restructure USA — Pastor Tunde Bakare by diadem10: 11:17pm On Oct 01|
Let's go back to regionalism. A regional center inside a federal center! The states under a region would remit her various proceeds to the regional center which would remits to the federal center. Lobatan!
I would also advise every regional government to have her own police and army but not the states. We're all tired of the illiterates and dumbass that make up the USA army and police.
15 Likes 1 Share
|Re: Independence: How To Restructure USA — Pastor Tunde Bakare by TheFreeOne: 11:43pm On Oct 01|
But northern leaders are feigning ignorance of what restructuring means despite many references to 60-63 constitutions/regional governments.
So what Tunde Bakare is proposing are ways to allay the fears of each region most especially northerners who are very reluctant in allowing restructuring.
However good it sounds there's no guarantee that such will be allowed to work except there's an iron clad agreement backed by foreign powers and the UN cos personally I don't trust Hausa / Fulani leaders will abide by such arrangement since present status quo is to their advantage.
|Re: Independence: How To Restructure USA — Pastor Tunde Bakare by BabaRamota1980: 1:51am On Oct 02|
Decades after the civil war, we are yet to forge true nationhood and Nigerians still tend to think of themselves as Yorubas, Igbos, Hausas, Fulanis, Kanuris, Tivs, Idomas, Nupes, Ijaws, Edos, Urhobos, and so on, within the USA state.
This is the root of the problem.
If you study his 10-point groupings you will see they largely fall into ethnocentric ideologues. What does that say?
We need a return to basic origin first...followed by dialogue on an alliance to partner at the center and build a USA of our future. We might even consider changing the name of our creation from USA to something else more desirable.
Rights of access to oil and mineral revenues compounded the problem but our ethnic clashes were already manifested in political interaction long before discovery of oil and other minerals. The division along these lines have not changed.
Until we acknowledge openly and sincerely that we need a reset button to return to our natural groupings first before forming an artificial identity, the imperfection of this sovereingty will continue to be a road block to unity in diversity.
No artificial creation, no matter the strength of ingenuity behind it, can outstrip the fundamental instincts of natural form.
11 Likes 1 Share
|Re: Independence: How To Restructure USA — Pastor Tunde Bakare by leofab(f): 1:57am On Oct 02|
|Re: Independence: How To Restructure USA — Pastor Tunde Bakare by Joel3(m): 3:43am On Oct 02|
is this not supposed to be novel?
|Re: Independence: How To Restructure USA — Pastor Tunde Bakare by ajoguegbe(m): 5:06am On Oct 02|
Who still listens to Bakare. To even imagine i voted Buhari because of bakare some years ago. An action im yet to forgive myselfafter the bakare I know suddenly went dumb in the face of the non performance of Buhari who he supported. Where is Save USA Group now that USA seriously need to be saved
23 Likes 1 Share
|Re: Independence: How To Restructure USA — Pastor Tunde Bakare by IamPatriotic(m): 6:19am On Oct 02|
The only meaningful and results oriented Restructuring that any sincere person should be clamoring for is the RESTRUCTURE OF THE MINDSET of Nigerians, whether as a Nationalists or a Successionists, with the mindsets most Nigerians currently possess, take us to the most developed parts of the world, we'll ruined the place in less than five (5) years, take for instance, I'm from Ondo State, and in the last 20-25 years, no either Hausa/Fulani or Igbo man had governed the State, it has been Ondo State indigenous people all through, yet the state is backward, but those who had held sway in the state as Governors, Commissioners, Local Government chairmen etc will either blame Lagos Politicians or the Hausa man who has never directly stolen from ondo state for underdeveloping the state, but will never own up to their inefficiencies and ineptitudeness, same goes to all states in the country, especially those of us from the Southern part of the country, we keep blaming the wrong people and calling for political restructuring that may not change anything if we keep operating with the status quo of our selfish and corrupt mindsets.
|Re: Independence: How To Restructure USA — Pastor Tunde Bakare by chemicalDisease: 6:24am On Oct 02|
This is punishment. is too long nah!
A good Samaritan should summarize pls.
|Re: Independence: How To Restructure USA — Pastor Tunde Bakare by Esseite: 6:28am On Oct 02|
The president divided the country to its extreme..
USA has always been a country where as long as they can feed and fend for their young, make a considerable living and forsee a brighter future they are good to go. The world tagged is the happiest humans
If for 55years we have celebrated events together as Nigerians and even the civil war didnt deter us. Why do we speak of such hatred and bigotry between one another now?
1 Like 1 Share
|Re: Independence: How To Restructure USA — Pastor Tunde Bakare by fiizznation(m): 6:47am On Oct 02|
I like some of the points. It will be a good thing for the country if some of Mr bakare's points are implemented in our national policy. But one thing I have come to realize about all this restructuring brouhaha is the hypocrisy behind it.
And when I say hypocrisy, I know what I mean. Well with time, a genuinely restructured USA will be a thing of the pass.
Happy independence day USA(ns)
|Re: Independence: How To Restructure USA — Pastor Tunde Bakare by Redoil: 6:48am On Oct 02|
This man made us understand that apc is the next best thing after fried yam
|Re: Independence: How To Restructure USA — Pastor Tunde Bakare by tdbankplc: 7:08am On Oct 02|
You are right in a way, but the government are being blamed too but the citizens have no power over them since they too will lie claiming the fed govt gave them little.
For instance we all hear the fed govt released all promotional arrears since 2013 but we workers are yet to collect the money... who is lying? The fed govt or the head of parastatals? Now we went on strike and the citizens r calling us heartless. There is always lie somewhere from the top down.
|Re: Independence: How To Restructure USA — Pastor Tunde Bakare by Brugo(m): 7:51am On Oct 02|
Long read but timely and relevant.
I like the fact that he recognized out main problem which is the default way we think. We first identify with our tribes before any other.
Also, he pointed out that before amalgamation we were not a group of robust nations but small warring groups with intolerance for our neighbors, going on slave raids and so on. So the idea of returning to past glory is redundant.
I agree with him that indeed, amalgamation put a stop to the needless bickering and raids that plagued our coexistence before the colonial government.
His speech is a well thought out plan for restructuring and can be further refined by debate in a proper conference. Our legislators should not be involved in discussing this since they are united in corruption and satisfied with the status quo.
Paperwhite:you didn't even read yet you have written such a stupìd and unfortunate comment. Stop reasoning from your anus.
7 Likes 1 Share
|Re: Independence: How To Restructure USA — Pastor Tunde Bakare by rlauncher(m): 8:31am On Oct 02|
Great speech by a true patriot. It greatly encapsulate every viewpoint in the national discourse on restructuring of the polity, taking into consideration the diverse interest of the various ethnic, social and political groups.
The 10years progressive transition in the process of restructuring of the polity suggested in this great piece is a welcomed development. It allay the fears of the poor states will give them ample time to prepare for economic independence from the Federal Government .
|Re: Independence: How To Restructure USA — Pastor Tunde Bakare by rlauncher(m): 8:45am On Oct 02|
The reason why we need restructuring in the first instance is because the different ethnicities that made up USA can never and will never give up their identities, because life is meaningless to them without their cultural heritage
Therefore, restructuring will give every people group the opportunity for self expression within their own localities without the interference of the other.
All over the world, be it America, Europe, China or India, people of different ethnic groups have preserved their cultural heritages while living together in a single country.
|Re: Independence: How To Restructure USA — Pastor Tunde Bakare by AburoBuhari: 8:57am On Oct 02|
the heavens will not forgive me on a Monday if I read this, even Buhari wey get matter self no fit read am,let's walk the talk and not continue to say the same thing year in year out
|Re: Independence: How To Restructure USA — Pastor Tunde Bakare by babyfaceafrica: 8:58am On Oct 02|
it is not going to hapen
|Re: Independence: How To Restructure USA — Pastor Tunde Bakare by jayson87: 9:01am On Oct 02|
This guy should keep quiet. He and his occupy USA cohorts brought this menace upon us with their protest under the goodluck administration. he should restructure his stagnant church first
|Re: Independence: How To Restructure USA — Pastor Tunde Bakare by 9japrof(m): 9:01am On Oct 02|
This mofo is one of the reasons why this country still have issues till date.
Why would a pastor be mixing religion with politics, preaching politics in the church instead of a message of salvation.
Talk from today till tomorrow, the status quo remains the same because the Hausa Fulani owns USA and whatever they want to do with it is what happens shikena
|Re: Independence: How To Restructure USA — Pastor Tunde Bakare by Olachase(m): 9:03am On Oct 02|
And this man has the strength to say all this. Well na person way Don chop belle food go fit talk
|Re: Independence: How To Restructure USA — Pastor Tunde Bakare by 111jideofor: 9:03am On Oct 02|
You arrested MAZI NNAMDI KANU, made him popular, you killed his people made him more popular. You named his movement a terrorist organisation, thereby drawing the world attention towards his demands. As if that is not enough
Now you want to kill him. And you think after killing him you will live for the rest of your life to enjoy one USA.
You started with mistakes, you are still running your Government on the same mistakes you started and no one is telling you to retrace your footsteps you are killing igbos most of your people are celebrating, you are killing shittes most of your kinsmen are celebrating.
FULANI HERDSMEN are still killing and kidnapping no arrest made, you called them criminals and called IPOB members terrorists just because they are predominantly IGBOS.
I pity you and those who are advising you . just like your wife said you are not in charge and those jihadists who are in charge will end up blaming you for all the have pushed you to do.
You can not win a Government with threats and propaganda and still sustain the same Government with threats and propaganda.
The good thing about PRESIDENT BUHARI is that in years to come he will be remembered as the man who destroyed USA with ethnicity and sectionalism.
Keep killing innocent Nigerians. Am sure God will reward you for that.
18 Likes 1 Share
|Re: Independence: How To Restructure USA — Pastor Tunde Bakare by 111jideofor: 9:08am On Oct 02|
SEE HOW USELESS USA IS, THEY DON'T HAVE 70M TO PAY AND CONTINUE WITH THE INTERNATIONAL BODIES AND ORGANIZATION THEY BELONG TO FOR YEARS NOW, BUT THE SAME USA USED 500M TO SPONSOR HILLARY CLINTON US ELECTION, THE SAME USA MAPPED OUT 50BN TO BRIBE OUR SOUTH SOUTH PEOPLE TO PLAY AGAINST BIAFRA, WHAT AN EVIL EMPIRE
10 mins · Public
4 Likes 1 Share
|Re: Independence: How To Restructure USA — Pastor Tunde Bakare by SweetJoystick(m): 9:18am On Oct 02|
This man just mess up with him 10 year plan..... that's like forever
|Re: Independence: How To Restructure USA — Pastor Tunde Bakare by Generalyemi(m): 9:19am On Oct 02|
another double mouth moda focka
|Re: Independence: How To Restructure USA — Pastor Tunde Bakare by LUGBE: 9:22am On Oct 02|
Who asked you. .amebo
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket